In a new development in the ongoing antitrust litigation against Google, three senior executives from Alphabet’s Google are scheduled to undergo deposition. This decision follows a ruling by Judge Sean D. Jordan of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, who found that these executives possess relevant knowledge pertinent to the case.
The executives to be deposed include Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Google co-founder Sergey Brin, and Neal Mohan, CEO of YouTube, a Google subsidiary.
According to Bloomberg, the ruling comes after Google sought a protective order to prevent the deposition of these top executives, arguing that it would be unwarranted. However, Judge Jordan denied the motion in part, siding with the coalition of plaintiff states led by Texas. This decision represents a notable victory for Texas and the coalition of 16 other states that have accused Google of monopolistic practices in the digital advertising markets.
Read more: Antitrust Suit Against Google Returns To Texas
The lawsuit, initially filed in 2020, alleges that Google has engaged in anticompetitive conduct to dominate the online display advertising sector, thereby stifling competition and harming advertisers, publishers and small businesses. The Texas-led coalition contends that Google’s actions violate antitrust laws and are designed to consolidate its control over the digital advertising ecosystem.
This case is one of three significant legal challenges against Google’s digital ad practices currently underway in U.S. federal courts. In addition to the Texas-led lawsuit, a separate coordinated legal proceeding in Manhattan involves advertisers, publishers and small businesses pressing similar claims against Google. Furthermore, the U.S. Justice Department filed a lawsuit last year in Alexandria, Virginia, also targeting Google’s digital advertising conduct.
Source: News Bloomberg Law
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand