By: Stacey Dogan (ProMarket)
Antitrust authorities in the U.S. and globally are increasingly focused on the expanding network of relationships between dominant tech companies and artificial intelligence (AI) developers. These partnerships, formed rapidly and often involving significant financial investments, come in various transactional forms. Tech firms portray these deals as fostering innovation and enhancing efficiency, claiming that the AI market remains highly competitive.
However, regulators are skeptical. While no formal challenges have yet been made, competition authorities in the U.S., European Union, United Kingdom, and other regions have adopted a stance of active scrutiny. Through information requests, investigations, policy statements, and public commentary, regulators have made it clear that they will closely monitor these developments. Their aim is to evaluate each deal in real time, ensuring they can respond swiftly to transactions that may lead to anticompetitive outcomes.
This strategy of vigilant oversight represents a pragmatic attempt to preserve the disruptive potential of AI technologies and maintain competitive markets. It also reflects a determination to avoid the mistakes made in past waves of tech disruption, such as those in personal computing, search engines, and social media, where a “wait-and-see” approach allowed certain firms to dominate.
Disruptive technologies like AI have the power to reshape markets, challenge established leaders, and fuel innovation. Economist Joseph Schumpeter described this process as “creative destruction,” in which new entrants challenge incumbents, leading to technological progress and, eventually, lower prices and better products for consumers. Disruption can also decentralize power, helping to prevent entrenched firms from gaining too much control over the economy, politics, and society.
Yet, even without the recent wave of deals, the nature of AI itself makes such disruption challenging, particularly in the realm of foundation models, which require immense computational power and vast datasets to develop. The barriers to entry are high, and market participation demands access to specialized resources—such as advanced chips, computing infrastructure, data, talent, and capital—many of which are controlled by Big Tech giants like Google and Amazon. These same companies also control the platforms, like search engines and social media networks, that are essential for delivering AI applications to consumers…
Featured News
Musk’s X Requests Brazil Supreme Court to Resume Service After Shutdown
Sep 26, 2024 by
CPI
Visa Acquires AI Firm Featurespace to Enhance Fraud Prevention
Sep 26, 2024 by
CPI
Visa Gears Up for Legal Fight with DOJ Over Debit Card Monopoly Allegations
Sep 26, 2024 by
CPI
UFC Fighters’ Lawsuit Settlement Resurfaces with $375 Million Offer
Sep 26, 2024 by
CPI
Ex-Amazon Seller Appario Files Lawsuit to Dismiss Antitrust Allegations
Sep 26, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
Francisco Javier Núñez Melgoza
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
Julio Garcia
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
Alejandra Palacios Prieto
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
Mateo Fernández