By Lewis K. Uhler & Peter J. Ferrara
Thanks to the recent efforts of Congress and the White House, the United States is moving back to President Reagan’s approach to antitrust — nonpartisan, light regulation to ensure the interests of consumers, not corporate interests, are prioritized.
Reagan’s Department of Justice recognized that government involvement in the economy often produces the corrupt result of raising prices and picking winners and losers in the marketplace. But fear of consumer abuse still prompted occasional antitrust action, typically with consent decrees, to increase competition in areas where large governmental footprints exist.
Featured News
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Partially Dismisses FTC’s Antitrust Case Against Amazon
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh