TikTok and its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, have petitioned a U.S. court to invalidate a law that would ban the widely-used short video app in the United States starting January 19. ByteDance argues that the U.S. government has refused to engage in meaningful settlement negotiations since 2022.
Legislation signed by President Joe Biden in April requires ByteDance to divest TikTok’s U.S. assets by January 19 or face a ban on the app, which boasts 170 million American users. ByteDance contends that a forced divestiture is “not possible technologically, commercially or legally.”
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is set to hear oral arguments on September 16 concerning lawsuits filed by TikTok, ByteDance and TikTok users. The outcome of this case could determine TikTok’s future in the United States and influence how the U.S. government regulates foreign-owned apps.
Related: EU Considers Adding X, TikTok-Owner ByteDance, and Booking to Digital Antitrust Regulations
“This law is a radical departure from this country’s tradition of championing an open Internet, and sets a dangerous precedent allowing the political branches to target a disfavored speech platform and force it to sell or be shut down,” ByteDance and TikTok argue in their request to the court to overturn the law, as reported by Reuters. The legislation, which passed Congress with overwhelming support, stems from U.S. lawmakers’ concerns that China could exploit the app to access data on Americans or conduct espionage.
TikTok maintains that any attempt at divestiture or separation would be a lengthy process, even if technically feasible, and claims that the law infringes upon Americans’ free speech rights. Furthermore, TikTok asserts that the legislation unfairly targets the app, neglecting other applications with significant operations in China that collect extensive U.S. user data, as well as many U.S. companies developing software and employing engineers in China.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand