In the wake of recent investigations by the European Commission into alleged price-fixing among prominent tire manufacturers, major players in the industry find themselves embroiled in a similar legal battle in the United States.
Pirelli, Continental, Michelin, Nokian, Bridgestone, and Goodyear have been sued in a U.S. federal court for their alleged involvement in anticompetitive practices, specifically price-fixing, reported Reuters.
The class-action lawsuit, filed by a California resident in Manhattan federal court, targets these tire giants and seeks class-action status for U.S. purchasers of tires dating back to January 2020. The suit alleges that the companies colluded to artificially raise and maintain high tire prices, affecting a wide range of vehicles, including cars, trucks, and buses.
Related: Italy Probes Major Low-Cost Carriers Over Price Fixing
The lawsuit is significant, considering the scope of the alleged misconduct, which spans several years and potentially involves a vast number of tires. The plaintiff claims that public communications played a role in facilitating this collusion among the tire manufacturers.
Responding to the allegations, Continental emphasized its commitment to compliance, stating, “We have a zero-tolerance policy when it comes to compliance and thoroughly follow up on and investigate all alleged allegations.” However, the other defendants, including Pirelli, Michelin, Nokian, Bridgestone, and Goodyear, either declined to comment or have not yet responded to requests for comment.
This legal action in the United States closely follows the European Commission’s announcement of an investigation into potential cartel behavior among tire manufacturers. The convergence of these investigations on both sides of the Atlantic underscores the gravity of the allegations and the heightened scrutiny faced by the tire industry.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand