By: Nicole Araujo (African Antitrust)
The rise of international e-commerce giants Shein and Temu — famous for their “ultra-cheap, ultra-fast” shopping experiences — has captured the attention of many South African consumers. These platforms have disrupted the market, posing a serious challenge to Takealot, the long-established leader, and raising concerns about the future of local competitors.
Doris Tshepe, Commissioner of the South African Competition Commission, highlighted the need for “all tools of government” to ensure fair competition, especially with the entry of major players like Amazon, Shein, and Temu. Her statement follows the release of the Commission’s Final Report on the Online Intermediation Platforms Market Inquiry (OIPMI) in July 2023, which identified Takealot as the dominant player with over 35% of online transactions.
As South Africa’s e-commerce sector expands rapidly, stronger competition regulations and updated policies are becoming increasingly necessary. While the OIPMI analyzed the market conditions at the time, the emergence of these international platforms, which were not covered by the initial inquiry, may now require a shift in regulatory focus.
To address the influx of low-value imports from Shein and Temu, the South African Revenue Service (SARS) implemented new tax rules in September 2024. Domestic retailers are taxed at 45% on imported clothing, while international platforms reportedly circumvent higher duties by splitting large orders into smaller shipments to stay under the R500 threshold. The new regulations subject even these smaller items to VAT and a 20% flat rate, regardless of their value.
While it is still too early to measure the full effect of these tax changes on sales, the adjustments aim to reduce the competitive advantage of cheaper imports by raising costs, making local options more appealing to consumers. Takealot, however, continues to push for further government intervention to ensure greater fairness in the market…
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand