Two Law Firms Set to Gain $300 Million from Texas Biometric Privacy Settlement with Meta
Two private law firms that played a pivotal role in Texas securing a $1.4 billion biometric privacy settlement with Meta Platforms, Facebook’s parent company, could collectively earn over $300 million in legal fees for their efforts, according to contracts they signed with the state.
The Texas Attorney General’s office enlisted Chicago-based Keller Postman and Dallas-based McKool Smith in 2022 to sue Meta over biometric privacy issues, agreeing to two potential payment structures. One option allocates 11% of the recovery to each firm, which translates to approximately $154 million each from the settlement.
The alternative payment structure involves an hourly rate for the lawyers, which can reach up to $945 per hour, multiplied by four. However, the contracts stipulate that the firms will receive the lesser amount between the two options, ensuring they do not collect more than the 11% contingency fee. The total hours worked by the firms have not been disclosed.
According to Reuters, which obtained the contracts through a records request, Keller Postman and McKool Smith are required to submit a final written statement detailing their fees and expenses within 60 days of the Meta biometric privacy settlement being “fully executed.”
Zina Bash, a partner at Keller Postman and former senior counsel to Texas’ Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, served as lead counsel in the Meta case. In an email, she emphasized the challenges faced by her firm: “Our team spent countless hours and advanced millions of dollars to help bring this momentous settlement to fruition,” she stated, highlighting that they contended with “an aggressive defendant with limitless resources and an appetite for challenging every conceivable aspect of our case.”
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand