In a pivotal turn of events leading up to the UFC’s antitrust trial, Judge Richard F. Boulware ruled on Monday in a Nevada courtroom on various motions, notably excluding 13 potential witnesses set to testify on behalf of the promotion.
Among the prominent figures initially slated to testify were UFC Hall of Famer Michael Bisping, Donald “Cowboy” Cerrone, Chael Sonnen, Miesha Tate, and Michael Chandler, alongside influential managers such as Ali Abdelaziz, Dan Lambert from American Top Team, and Jason House, CEO of Iridium Sports Agency.
However, Judge Boulware granted the plaintiff’s motion to exclude these witnesses, including the fighters, managers, and even current UFC matchmaker Mick Maynard, citing failure to disclose the witness list ahead of time for proper deposition processes. Paul Gift initially reported the development on Twitter.
The plaintiff’s legal team argued that the delayed disclosure impeded their ability to prepare adequately for the trial. Despite objections from the UFC’s legal representation, Judge Boulware ultimately sided with the plaintiffs, precluding the 13 witnesses from testifying.
Read more: UFC’s Hopes Dashed as Ninth Circuit Denies Antitrust Appeal
During the hearing, Judge Boulware also acknowledged ongoing discussions between the UFC and the plaintiffs regarding a possible resolution before the trial. While no agreements have been reached, both parties are engaged in mediation.
With numerous delays in setting a trial date, Judge Boulware emphasized that there would be no further extensions unless a resolution is reached before the scheduled April 15 date. Otherwise, the trial is mandated to commence on that date.
At the core of the antitrust lawsuit lies the fighters’ claims that the UFC employed tactics to acquire and maintain monopoly power in the market for elite professional MMA fighter services. Allegations include utilizing acquisitions, exclusive contracts, and coercion to achieve this dominance.
The plaintiffs are seeking substantial damages ranging between $894 million and $1.6 billion, underlining the significance and complexity of the legal battle set to unfold in the coming weeks.
Source: MMA Fighting
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand