U.K. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s cryptocurrency plans have reportedly hit some snags.
As Bloomberg News reported Sunday (April 2), crypto companies were already dealing with pushback from big British banks like HSBC and NatWest, which in February put limits on the amount of money customers in the U.K. can transfer to digital asset exchanges.
Now, crypto firms say they’re running into new banking difficulties, such as rejected applications to excess paperwork, leading the companies to petition the government for help.
“There aren’t many options available — most traditional banks won’t offer banking services to crypto firms,” Edouard Daunizeau, CEO of the London-based crypto investing company SavingBlocks, said in an interview with Bloomberg.
“With the recent string of events it will be even tougher. We are seeking licenses in France where we think it will be easier.”
Related: Binance Suspending Crypto Transfers In The UK
The U.K. government last year announced plans to make the country a “global hub” for cryptocurrency companies.
While the country has had three leadership changes since then, Sunak’s elevation to prime minister in October 2022 was greeted with enthusiasm among crypto enthusiasts because of his support for the “hub” plan in his time as chancellor.
However, a lot has happened in the digital asset sector since then, including the downfall of FTX, the collapse of two crypto-friendly banks, and an increase in regulatory pressure on Binance, the world’s biggest cryptocurrency exchange.
In March, HSBC and Nationwide Building Society announced a ban on cryptocurrency purchases using credit cards for their retail customers, while also creating tougher restrictions on debit-card purchases of crypto to a daily limit of $6,000.
(HSBC last month announced plans to acquire — and invest $2.1 billion in — failed lender Silicon Valley Bank’s U.K. operations.)
And despite Sunak’s support for the industry, the country’s financial watchdog — the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has for years labeled crypto as high risk, even threatening crypto executives with jail time if they break certain rules.
“The cryptocurrency sector has yet to pull the proverbial magic rabbit from its top hat,” PYMNTS wrote in March. “The audience, having purchased tickets to the show, are now realizing they may leave empty-handed as their hard-earned money pulls a disappearing act.”
Instead of revolutionizing the financial world the way the technology’s advocates promised, the industry has instead been rocked by “bad actors and back-door platforms, leaving its future more uncertain than ever.”
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand