The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is set to revamp its staff payment structure following allegations that its previous bonus scheme was discriminatory towards minority employees. According to an internal note seen by Financial News London, the planned changes are aimed at addressing criticisms of racial bias and inequality in its performance-based reward system.
The CMA is considering shifting to a nomination-based payment system, a move which marks a departure from its existing performance grading method. This shift, first revealed in a post by the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) on the CMA’s intranet, would allow staff and managers to nominate colleagues for financial awards, instead of relying on performance ratings.
The agency has not yet finalized the proposed reforms and is holding staff engagement sessions to gather feedback, according to the PCS post. Despite repeated requests, the CMA declined to comment on the ongoing changes.
The proposed overhaul follows a discrimination claim in 2022, when several ethnic minority employees at the CMA alleged that they had been unfairly excluded from receiving bonuses. The employees, who raised their grievances at an employment tribunal, argued that the old scheme — which awarded bonuses to staff rated as “consistently exceeding” or “partially exceeding” in performance evaluations — disproportionately disadvantaged Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME) staff. The CMA settled the case without admitting liability but paused all performance-related bonuses while a review was conducted.
Read more: Steptoe Expands Antitrust Practice with Key London Hire
According to Financial News London, a recent note from the PCS revealed further troubling statistics about pay discrepancies under the old system. Minority staff reportedly received 76p for every £1 awarded to white employees, and part-time workers received 80p compared to their full-time counterparts.
PCS general secretary Fran Heathcote voiced her union’s concerns over the new proposal. While welcoming the CMA’s decision to separate pay from the appraisal process, Heathcote expressed doubts about whether the new reward scheme would eliminate discrimination.
“We are deeply concerned that the current in-year reward scheme delivers the same potential discriminatory outcomes,” Heathcote said in the note, emphasizing the union’s ongoing commitment to ensuring pay equity for all employees, particularly BME, disabled, and part-time workers. She added, “We are yet to see an appraisal system that delivers equitable outcomes for all members.”
The union has called for a recognition-based system that distributes pay more equally across the CMA, arguing that this approach would allow the agency to focus its resources more effectively on its core work. The discussions are ongoing, with CMA staff awaiting the final outcome of the proposed reforms.
Source: Financial News London
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand