UK Government Prioritizes Cautious Approach to AI Regulation in New Legislative Agenda
The UK’s newly-elected Labour government has announced plans to explore effective regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) models, but has not yet proposed any specific laws. In a speech to open the new session of parliament, King Charles outlined Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s legislative agenda, which includes over 35 new bills ranging from housing to cybersecurity measures, according to Reuters.
Among the new initiatives, the government aims to establish appropriate legislation for those developing the most powerful AI models. This move signals a continuation of Britain’s strategic focus on AI, following the efforts of the previous Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, who positioned the UK as a leader in AI safety. Last November, Sunak hosted a summit at Bletchley Park, bringing together global leaders and company executives to discuss AI regulation. Under his leadership, the UK also launched the world’s first AI Safety Institute, which has focused on the capabilities of frontier AI models, such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT.
Read more: New Report Says AI Regulations Lag Behind Industry Advances
Nathan Benaich, founding partner of AI-focused investment group Air Street Capital, noted that AI labs are likely relieved by the government’s decision not to hastily introduce regulation for frontier models. During Sunak’s tenure, the government avoided targeted AI regulations, instead distributing oversight responsibilities among various regulators.
Starmer has promised to introduce new AI laws, but his administration is adopting a cautious approach. “The UK’s cautious, sector-based approach to AI regulation remains a crucial competitive advantage versus the EU, and any moves to change this regime should only be taken with the utmost caution,” Benaich commented.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand