The British Labour government is reportedly crafting a new artificial intelligence (AI) strategy focused on cost-cutting measures and increased public sector adoption, in anticipation of a critical autumn budget. According to Reuters, Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s administration is prioritizing the integration of AI within public services over direct investments in the technology sector.
Since taking office in July, Starmer’s government has been scrutinizing the financial implications of AI-related initiatives, leading to significant changes in the previous administration’s plans. The most notable of these changes is the cancellation of a £1.3 billion ($1.72 billion) investment package for AI and related technologies, a plan originally set in motion by the former Conservative government. This package included an £800 million investment aimed at developing a supercomputer at the University of Edinburgh. Although the £1.3 billion investment represents a modest sum in the broader context of global AI funding, its withdrawal has sparked criticism from industry leaders, who argue it could signal a diminishing commitment to technological innovation in the UK.
In contrast, France has been making strides as a European leader in AI, recently committing €2.5 billion ($2.77 billion) to foster domestic development of the technology. The disparity between the UK’s and France’s approaches has raised concerns within the British tech sector about the country’s future role in the AI landscape.
Read more: Brazil Launches Antitrust Investigations into Big Tech AI Acquisitions
Additionally, the Labour government is considering abandoning plans for a San Francisco office for the AI Safety Institute, per Reuters. This office, which was initially slated to open over the summer, would have employed staff at competitive market rates, with salaries potentially exceeding $100,000 each. A source close to the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) suggested that Labour’s decision to scale back on AI safety initiatives reflects a broader strategy to differentiate itself from the Conservative Party.
In a move that further underscores this shift in direction, Tech Minister Peter Kyle dismissed Nitarshan Rajkumar, one of the co-founders of the AI Safety Institute, from his position as a senior policy adviser in July, according to multiple sources close to DSIT. While it is common for new administrations to bring in their own advisers, the dismissal has been met with some backlash within the industry. Rajkumar himself announced his departure on social media, without mentioning that his contract had been terminated.
Jordan Sullivan, from the lobby group Startup Coalition, expressed disappointment over Rajkumar’s exit, describing it as a “huge loss to the UK civil service” in a post on social media platform X. Sullivan emphasized that Rajkumar was precisely the type of talent the government should have retained.
Amid these changes, Labour has enlisted Matt Clifford, a tech entrepreneur and the organizer of last year’s AI Safety Summit under then-Conservative leader Rishi Sunak, to develop a new AI strategy. Clifford’s plan is expected to be presented in September, ahead of the government’s Autumn Statement in October.
Despite the shift in strategy, a government spokesperson affirmed the administration’s commitment to leveraging AI for economic growth and creating new opportunities across the UK. According to Reuters, Tech Minister Kyle is keen on promoting AI adoption within the public sector as a means to enhance efficiency and reduce costs, while simultaneously scaling back direct government investments in the tech industry.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Nvidia’s $700 Million Buyout of Run:ai Gets EU Approval, Deal Finalized
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
Taiwan FTC Halts Uber’s $950M Foodpanda Buyout Over Antitrust Fears
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
White House Pushes for Stronger Healthcare Data Security
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
Microsoft’s Cybersecurity Bundles Draw Antitrust Inquiry
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
UK Watchdog to Review IBM’s $6.4 Billion Acquisition of HashiCorp
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand