UK ministers are likely to reject Big Tech’s request for broader appeal rights against decisions made by the country’s antitrust regulator under new digital market rules.
The government intends to utilize the new Digital Markets Unit within the Competition and Market Authority to intensify scrutiny on companies like Alphabet and Meta Platforms, with the aim of reducing their dominance, reported Yahoo News.
The division is anticipated to possess the authority to impose fines on internet firms to protect consumers and potentially enable smaller companies to access data held by larger ones. This could also result in tech companies compensating media outlets for featuring news stories.
As per the current plans, challenges to DMU rulings would be limited to ensuring that the CMA followed the correct procedure when making its decisions. However, tech companies have pushed for the ability to appeal decisions based on the “full merits,” which would include examining the regulator’s assumptions and underlying evidence.
Related: UK MPs Urge Regulator To Curb Big Tech
Nonetheless, ministers are poised to dismiss the tech companies’ demands due to concerns that the proposed changes would disadvantage smaller companies in their competition with larger rivals. Allowing appeals based on full merits could also extend and escalate the judicial process.
“I will consider various perspectives and make an evidence-based decision,” stated Secretary of State for Science, Innovation, and Technology, Michelle Donelan, during an interview at the Bloomberg Technology Summit in London. She emphasized that the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill is intended to level the competitive landscape to the benefit of consumers and innovation.
The bill is presently under parliamentary review and will continue into the new session, commencing with the King’s Speech on November 7. The final wording on the appeals process has not yet been determined, but an announcement is expected in the next two months.
Source: News Yahoo
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand