UK ministers are likely to reject Big Tech’s request for broader appeal rights against decisions made by the country’s antitrust regulator under new digital market rules.
The government intends to utilize the new Digital Markets Unit within the Competition and Market Authority to intensify scrutiny on companies like Alphabet and Meta Platforms, with the aim of reducing their dominance, reported Yahoo News.
The division is anticipated to possess the authority to impose fines on internet firms to protect consumers and potentially enable smaller companies to access data held by larger ones. This could also result in tech companies compensating media outlets for featuring news stories.
As per the current plans, challenges to DMU rulings would be limited to ensuring that the CMA followed the correct procedure when making its decisions. However, tech companies have pushed for the ability to appeal decisions based on the “full merits,” which would include examining the regulator’s assumptions and underlying evidence.
Related: UK MPs Urge Regulator To Curb Big Tech
Nonetheless, ministers are poised to dismiss the tech companies’ demands due to concerns that the proposed changes would disadvantage smaller companies in their competition with larger rivals. Allowing appeals based on full merits could also extend and escalate the judicial process.
“I will consider various perspectives and make an evidence-based decision,” stated Secretary of State for Science, Innovation, and Technology, Michelle Donelan, during an interview at the Bloomberg Technology Summit in London. She emphasized that the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill is intended to level the competitive landscape to the benefit of consumers and innovation.
The bill is presently under parliamentary review and will continue into the new session, commencing with the King’s Speech on November 7. The final wording on the appeals process has not yet been determined, but an announcement is expected in the next two months.
Source: News Yahoo
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh