The FCA has proposed new measures to clamp down on unfair or misleading financial marketing.
The proposals, outlined in a consultation paper published on Tuesday (Dec. 6), target crypto asset service providers and buy now, pay later (BNPL) loan providers.
Although the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) itself does not write the law but only enforces it, the document points to ongoing efforts by lawmakers to bring both sectors within its regulatory remit.
In January, the government announced its intention to regulate crypto asset marketing.
Related: UK Crypto Firms Will Need FCA Approval To Advertise
Rishi Sunak, chancellor at the time, said, “crypto assets can provide exciting new opportunities, offering people new ways to transact and invest — but it’s important that consumers are not being sold products with misleading claims.”
On the BNPL front, following a government review of the sector, in June the Treasury recommended regulating BNPL lenders in much the same way as other lenders. The recommendations included granting the FCA powers to oversee the space and imposing rules to prevent predatory practices such as the use of misleading advertisements.
For both BNPL and crypto advertisements, the UK government has chosen the Financial Services and Markets Bill (FSMB) as the legislative instrument that will carry the new rules into law.
Recently tabled amendments to the bill, which will be discussed in Parliament on Wednesday (Dec. 7) will grant the FCA power to oversee both crypto asset service providers and BNPL lenders. Under the new framework, both groups of companies will be held to the same advertising rules and standards as all FCA-regulated entities.
While non-regulated companies can currently advertise financial products in the U.K., they can only do so with the backing of an FCA-approved partner.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand