Britain’s competition regulator has given new life to Microsoft’s proposed Activision Blizzard merger after throwing a lifeline to both companies on Wednesday.
The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has said that a restructured deal could satisfy its concerns, although it warned that negotiations were still ‘at an early stage’.
The CMA blocked the Microsoft-Activision deal earlier this year over cloud gaming competition concerns, but both companies are now looking to negotiate a new proposal that addresses the CMA’s concerns.
The CMA said that whilst merging parties don’t have the opportunity to put forward new remedies once a final report has been issued, they could ‘choose to restructure a deal which can lead to a new merger investigation.’
Microsoft and Activision have indicated that they are considering modifying the transaction, and the CMA has said it is prepared to engage with them over it.
Related: Major Setback for FTC as Judge Clears Microsoft’s Acquisition of Activision Blizzard
CNBC reported yesterday that Microsoft and the CMA had agreed on a ‘small divestiture’ in order to address the cloud gaming concerns.
The European Union had also raised cloud-gaming competition concerns but approved the deal in June, thanks to 10-year licensing deals that Microsoft offered to cloud-gaming competitors, per AP.
Although the UK regulator’s decision to throw a lifeline to the deal’s embattled parties has surprised many advisers and competition lawyers, the CMA has remained adamant that discussions are still in the early stages and a new merger investigation may still be triggered.
Alex Haffner, competition partner at UK law firm Fladgate, said: ‘It is really an unprecedented and dramatic turn of events.’
According to an unnamed source close to the deal, the UK regulator was unwilling to stand out of touch with the two major jurisdictions of the European Union and the United States.
Jonathan Compton, partner at law firm DMH Stallard and a specialist in competition law, warned that Microsoft could face fresh inquiry from the FTC and/or the Commission should it restructure the deal.
The CMA has not given any further clarification on its u-turn or the new investigation, leaving many questions surrounding the agreement yet unanswered.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand