The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has approved the sale of Sporting Index’s assets by Spreadex, resolving competition concerns arising from the acquisition of the rival spread betting platform. Spreadex had purchased the business-to-consumer (B2C) arm of Sporting Index from FDJ in November 2023 for an undisclosed amount, but the CMA determined the merger would harm market competition.
Following an in-depth Phase 2 investigation, the CMA’s independent panel found that the acquisition effectively created a monopoly in the UK licensed online sports spread betting sector. According to Reuters, the CMA concluded that reduced competition could lead to higher prices, a more limited range of products, and a diminished user experience for consumers.
Panel’s Decision and Spreadex’s Response
Richard Feasey, chair of the CMA’s independent panel reviewing the case, emphasized the importance of maintaining competition in the sports spread betting market. He stated:
“This deal eliminates competition in the supply of licensed online sports spread betting services in the UK. Sports spread betting – like any other market – needs competition to drive good customer experience, maintain choice and keep prices competitive. To achieve this, we have decided that Spreadex should sell Sporting Index, so that customers can choose between two firms for the best user experience and prices, rather than having to use only one.”
Despite the CMA’s findings, Spreadex had initially criticized the ruling. The company had argued that the deal was relatively small in scale and had a limited impact on the broader sports betting market. According to Reuters, Spreadex further contended that if it had not acquired the Sporting Index B2C division, the likely outcome would have been the closure of the business due to a lack of credible alternative bidders.
Related: UK’s CMA Raises Concerns Over Spreadex-Sporting Index Acquisition
Remedy for Competition Concerns
The CMA panel ultimately deemed the proposed sale of Sporting Index sufficient to address its concerns. The sale will allow the market to maintain two competing operators, ensuring consumers continue to benefit from choice and competitive pricing in the niche sports spread betting market.
Sports spread betting differs from traditional fixed-odds betting by allowing wagers on a range of outcomes for a given event, offering greater variability in potential pay-offs. The panel highlighted the importance of preserving competition in this specialized market, which relies on competitive dynamics to deliver high-quality services and fair pricing.
Financial Context
Spreadex has demonstrated robust financial performance, reporting £103.2 million in revenue for the financial year ending May 2024. Despite its success, the company has faced regulatory hurdles since acquiring Sporting Index. In July, Spreadex expressed strong opposition to the CMA’s provisional findings, asserting that the acquisition did not negatively impact competition.
With the approval of the asset sale, Spreadex’s brief ownership of Sporting Index is set to conclude, marking a resolution to the regulatory dispute while ensuring consumer interests are protected in the UK’s sports spread betting market.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand