The UK’s competition regulator has issued a stark warning regarding the government’s proposed reforms to the Package Travel Regulations (PTRs), cautioning that the changes could result in confusion for consumers and significant upheaval within the travel sector.
The Department of Business and Trade (DBT) unveiled its proposals in September, aiming to revamp the PTRs by implementing a minimum cost threshold for package rules, deregulating domestic holidays, and streamlining or eliminating Linked Travel Arrangements.
However, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), in its response to the DBT’s call for evidence, has raised concerns about the potential repercussions of these proposed alterations. The CMA highlighted the risk of “unintended and unforeseen consequences” resulting from the significant changes to the PTRs.
“The CMA believes that one of the primary reasons consumers opt for a package holiday is the elevated level of protection it affords,” stated the CMA in its response. “Should this protection diminish, consumers may find themselves with less recourse when issues arise, potentially prompting them to seek alternatives, thereby triggering substantial transformations within the sector.”
Related: UK To Replace EU Exemptions From Antitrust Law For Producers
Moreover, the authority cautioned that the proposed reforms could diminish the standard of protection offered by tour operators selling packages to UK customers compared to their counterparts in other nations. Specifically, the removal of financial protection from domestic packages was highlighted as a concern, with the CMA expressing apprehension that this move could confuse consumers, particularly if a tour operator offers both protected foreign holidays and non-protected domestic ones.
The CMA’s response underscores the complexity and potential pitfalls of the government’s proposed PTR reforms. While the DBT seeks to modernize and streamline regulations, the cautionary stance from the CMA emphasizes the need for thorough consideration of the implications for consumer protection and industry stability.
Source: TTG Media
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand