Qualcomm and Apple’s US$1 billion battle has ended in a mixed ruling, with a US judge granting Qualcomm’s motion to dismiss, but granted Apple’s motion to dismiss counterclaims of unfair competition.
In January, Apple sued Qualcomm in the US District Court for the Southern District of California for unfairly insisting on charging royalties for “technologies they have nothing to do with”.
The smartphone maker sought a declaration of non-infringement or invalidity, or that the court set a fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory royalty on nine Qualcomm patents.
Apple claimed that the more it innovated with new features, the more money Qualcomm collects for “no reason” and the “more expensive it becomes for Apple to fund these innovations”.
According to Apple, Qualcomm has withheld nearly US$1 billion in payments from Apple as retaliation for “responding truthfully to law enforcement agencies investigating them”, alluding to antitrust investigations that have cost Qualcomm billions of dollars.
But Judge Gonzalo Curiel said that the absence of “detailed infringement analysis” as to the nine patents weighed severely against a declaratory judgement.
In the ruling, Curiel explained, “The court will ‘decline to invest judicial time and resources in a declaratory action’ that requests only piecemeal relief that does not resolve the disputes between the party in a worthwhile way.”
Full Content: Law 360
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Malaysia Introduces New Licensing Requirement for Digital Platforms
Jul 28, 2024 by
CPI
Drivers in Britain Still Overpaying for Road Fuel, UK Watchdog Reports
Jul 28, 2024 by
CPI
Six Major Banks Settle European Bond Price-Fixing Litigation
Jul 28, 2024 by
CPI
Italian Unit of Amazon Faces Second Probe for Suspected Tax Evasion
Jul 28, 2024 by
CPI
UnitedHealth Group Abandons Two Acquisitions Following Antitrust Division Scrutiny
Jul 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – International Trade & Antitrust
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI
What is Wrong with the WTO Discipline on Subsidies?
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI
The Abiding Tension Between Trade Remedy Law and Antitrust
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI
Trade and Antitrust: An End to Isolationism
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI
International Trade Law and Domestic Regulation of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Divergent Approaches?
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI