Pharmaceutical companies Mylan NV, Pfizer, and other pharmaceutical companies lost their bid to end antitrust litigation brought by nearly every state attorney general over an alleged industrywide scheme to inflate the cost of generic dermatology products, reported Bloomberg.
The ruling by US District Judge Claire Cecchi in Newark, New Jersey, means the companies must face claims they violated state laws by secretly agreeing not to compete to sell drugs used to treat acne, psoriasis, and other conditions.
The attorney generals accused the companies of conspiring to keep prices for the drugs artificially high. They said the companies agreed to divide the market among themselves and not compete on price.
Related: UK Fines Big Pharma Over Drug Prices
The lawsuit was first filed back in April 2016 and arises out of an alleged price-fixing conspiracy by the defendants, which include numerous major pharmaceutical companies such as Mylan, Pfizer, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, along with individual executives of the companies.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of the attorney general of the states of Arizona, Connecticut, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island and Vermont, as well as the District of Columbia.
The lawsuit claims that the defendants conspired to fix prices, allocate customers, and engage in other anticompetitive conduct in relation to generic dermatology drugs. The lawsuit is seeking to recover the damages which were caused by the alleged illegal activities.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand