Facebook moved Tuesday, June 26, to let some advertisements for cryptocurrency run on its platform.
In a blog post, Rob Leathern, Facebook’s director of product management, said the social media giant is refining its approach to allowing crypto ads on its platform after it announced in January it was banning cryptocurrency ads that promoted binary options and initial coin offerings (ICOs). Leathern said at the time that Facebook made it clear the policy was broad on purpose until it figured out what were the deceptive and misleading advertising practices.
In the past few months, he said the company looked at the best way to refine the policy to enable some ads and, at the same time, keep users safe. The result: cryptocurrency ads can run on the platform, but Facebook is banning ads that promote binary options and ICOs.
Leathern wrote, “Advertisers wanting to run ads for cryptocurrency products and services must submit an application to help us assess their eligibility — including any licenses they have obtained, whether they are traded on a public stock exchange, and other relevant public background on their business… Given these restrictions, not everyone who wants to advertise will be able to do so. But we’ll listen to feedback, look at how well this policy works and continue to study this technology so that, if necessary, we can revise it over time.”
He ended by encouraging users to report content that violates advertising policies of Facebook.
The move on the part of Facebook comes after it said in May it that was creating a blockchain unit led by one of its most senior executives, David Marcus. That raised concern among those in the blockchain world, because the social media company said little in public about what the group will be doing. Facebook’s motivation to embrace blockchain could be a competitive move to be ahead of any threat that comes from a rival.
Full Content: PYMNTS
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand