The FCC is taking issue with AT&T over its plans to launch DirecTV as a zero-rated streaming video service.
The US watchdog’s Wireless Telecommunications Bureau has sent a letter to AT&T’s senior executive veep of external and legislative affairs asking the telecoms giant to address concerns that by omitting DirecTV from counting towards customer data caps on its mobile plans, AT&T was engaging in anti-competitive behavior.
The letter, signed by Wireless Telecommunications Bureau chief Jon Wilkins, acknowledges that while AT&T is allowed to zero-rate services, omitting its own DirecTV plans for free while charging rival services for the same zero-rate status creates an unfair playing field for third-party video services.
The issue of over-the-top streaming services did arise in July of 2015 when the FCC gave its approval to the $50bn acquisition of DirecTV by AT&T, though mobile service had been curiously overlooked.
In order to get the deal through, the commission imposed a requirement that AT&T refrain from zero-rating its own services, but only on wired connections.
Now, the commission wants to take a closer look at whether AT&T could similarly be harming competition when it applies the zero-rating offer to mobile customers.
“Our concern is not with zero-rating per Se. To the contrary, the Commission acknowledged in the 2015 Open Internet Order that zero-rating-based business models may, in some instances, provide consumer and competitive benefits,” the letter reads
“The focus of this letter is the specific impact of AT&T’s zero-rating practice on competition, as implemented through the terms and conditions of AT&T’s Sponsored Data program.”
Full Content: The Register
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand