The European Commission has imposed a fine of €337.5 million on Mondelēz, the American multinational behind popular brands such as Oreo and Toblerone, for obstructing cross-border trade within the EU’s Single Market. This decision concludes a five-year investigation into the company’s practices, which were found to be in breach of EU antitrust regulations.
The antitrust investigation revealed that Mondelēz had been illegally restricting retailers from sourcing their products from member states where prices were lower, effectively maintaining higher prices across the EU. This practice, which spanned from 2006 to 2020, involved agreements with traders to limit the sale of products in specific EU territories, affecting chocolates, biscuits, and coffee.
“This harms consumers who end up paying more for chocolates, biscuits, and coffee. It’s a key concern to European citizens and even more obvious in times of very high inflation, where many are in a cost of living crisis,” stated Margrethe Vestager, the Commission’s Vice-President, during today’s press conference.
Vestager emphasized that these practices undermine parallel trade, where traders buy products in countries with lower prices to sell in higher-priced markets. Parallel trade is seen by the Commission as a mechanism to boost consumer choice and keep prices competitive.
“There is a huge potential for parallel trade if it is not restricted. It puts pressure on prices to come down,” added Vestager, who oversees competition enforcement.
The EU Commission’s findings indicated that Mondelēz had entered into 11 separate agreements with seven traders to restrict cross-border sales, breaking antitrust rules. This behavior was found to violate Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which prohibit restrictive business practices and abuse of a dominant market position.
In recognition of Mondelēz’s cooperation during the investigation, the fine was reduced by 15%, facilitating a more efficient resolution of the case. Despite this reduction, the substantial penalty underscores the Commission’s commitment to enforcing antitrust laws and protecting consumer interests within the Single Market.
Source: Euro News
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand