LendingClub, the online lender that was once a favorite of Wall Street investors, saw its stock hit a record low on Wednesday, April 25, after it faced allegations by regulators in the US that it was adding on hidden fees and charging borrowers even after they no longer had a loan with the company.
Bloomberg reported the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) contends the company’s behavior violated federal laws that protect consumers from deceptive and unfair practices. As a result of the FTC complaint, Bloomberg noted the online lender’s stock fell 14% to $2.80 a share, off 32 percent so far this year. Since its initial public offering, LendingClub’s stock has declined 80%.
“Many consumers are forced to pay overdraft fees, while other consumers are unable to pay other bills because they do not have access to the money that defendants improperly withdrew,” the FTC said in its lawsuit, which Bloomberg reported was filed in San Francisco.
The FTC contends LendingClub vowed not to slap borrowers with hidden fees even though it took hundreds of dollars — and in some cases thousands of dollars — in fees from the loans. The FTC said LendingClub also claimed investors backed their loans, even though it knew borrowers would never get a loan, which prevented them from borrowing from another lender.
Additionally, the FTC contends that LendingClub even withdrew double payments from consumers’ accounts and charged those that no longer owed any money on their loans.
“This case demonstrates the importance to consumers of having truthful information from lenders, including online marketplace lenders,” said Reilly Dolan, acting director of the FTC’s Consumer Protection unit. “Stopping this kind of conduct will help consumers make informed choices about loan offers.”
In response to the lawsuit, LendingClub told Bloomberg it was disappointed with the lawsuit. “In our decade-plus history, we have helped more than 2 million people access low-cost credit and have co-founded two associations that raised the bar for transparency,” the company said. “The allegations cannot be reconciled with this longstanding record of consumer satisfaction that’s reflected in every available objective metric.”
Full Content: PYMNTS
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand