The acquisition of Activision Blizzard by Microsoft has faced a setback as a federal district court judge in California has granted the US Federal Trade Commission’s request to temporarily block the deal from closing.
Judge Edward Davila from California’s Northern District has issued a temporary restraining order that prevents Microsoft and Activision from completing the proposed transaction and maintains the current state of affairs, reported Reuters.
The court did not make a decision on the FTC’s request for a preliminary injunction, which could cause a further delay in the transaction. Another hearing has been scheduled for June 22 and 23, to be presided over by a different judge.
The FTC filed a complaint in federal court on Monday, requesting that the court halt the merger while the agency’s administrative review of the transaction is ongoing.
Related: Sony Calls UK’s Reversed Stance On Microsoft Activision Deal ‘Surprising & Irrational’
In December 2022, the FTC filed a lawsuit against the Activision Blizzard acquisition, stating that it may allow Microsoft to impede its competitors in the gaming console, subscription content, and cloud-gaming industry.
The possibility of the deal moving forward during the FTC review is contingent on the court’s ruling regarding the agency’s preliminary injunction request. The court has specified that the deal cannot be finalized until a later date determined by the court or until five days after the matter is resolved, whichever is later.
“Accelerating the legal process in the US will ultimately bring more choice and competition to the gaming market. A temporary restraining order makes sense until we can receive a decision from the Court, which is moving swiftly,” a spokesperson for Microsoft told Yahoo Finance.
On Monday, Brad Smith, the vice president of Microsoft, expressed the company’s willingness to present its case in a federal court.
The speaker stated that expediting the legal process in the US would result in increased market choice and competition.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand