Lloyds bank has reportedly reached a settlement deal with the US Department of Justice over allegations the lender manipulated the LIBOR benchmark rate.
According to reports, Lloyds Banking Group has admitted to wrongdoing and agreed to pay $86 million in fees for the LIBOR manipulation. The settlement was first announced by the DOJ’s Antitrust Division, and reports say the details regarding the settlement were expected to be filed in court on Monday.
The bank has also agreed to continue to cooperate with the DOJ’s investigation into the matter.
In a statement, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brent Snyder of the DOJ’s Antitrust Division said “Lloyds manipulated benchmark rates, allowing its traders to increase their profits unfairly and fraudulently.”
The settlement is only the latest development in the long-lasting, global scandal. Reports say about $283 million in penalties have been imposed on Lloyds for similar allegations by authorities including the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority. Including the DOJ’s latest fine, Lloyds has been penalized nearly $370 million for the alleged LIBOR manipulation.
Full content: eNews Park Forest
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand