The Dublin-based Botox-maker Allergan announced early Wednesday it would abandon its mega-merger with US pharmaceutical giant Pfizer after new government regulations made the tax advantage of the cross-Atlantic deal more difficult to achieve.
The move is a huge victory for the Obama administration in its campaign against inversions, in which US-based companies buy or merge with smaller foreign firms and move their headquarters overseas to lower their tax bills. The Treasury Department released new regulations Monday to stem the tide of such inversions, and Pfizer and Allergan spent two days scrambling to determine whether their merger still made financial sense.
The merger, the largest proposed inversion in history, was expected to lower the pharmaceutical giant’s tax rate significantly, from about 24 percent to 17 percent, and save the company about $35 billion in taxes. But the rules announced late Monday would have made those savings harder to obtain.
In separate press releases, the companies called it a mutual decision, and Pfizer said it agreed to pay Allergan a $150 million breakup fee.
Full content: NYTimes
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Malaysia Grants Licenses to WeChat and TikTok Under New Social Media Law
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Axinn Announces Promotions of Antitrust Experts
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Federal Competition Office to Scrutinize High Electricity Prices in Germany
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Mexican Lawmakers Advance Controversial Plan to Dissolve Independent Oversight Bodies
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Motorola Accuses UK of Antitrust Breach Over Terminated Emergency Services Contract
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand