The American Board of Radiology didn’t violate antitrust laws by tying together its physician certification and recertification programs because they’re different components of one product with a single market, a Chicago federal judge ruled.
According to Bloomberg Law the ruling lines up with a prior decision dismissing an antitrust lawsuit against the American Board of Internal Medicine. A Philadelphia federal judge rejected the “tying” claims in that case, Kenney v. ABIM, in September. His logic was compelling, according to the Nov. 19 ruling by Judge Jorge L. Alonso of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
In early 2019 a radiologist in Tennessee filed a federal class action lawsuit against the American Board of Radiology (ABR) that alleged the ABR was in violation of antitrust laws. The lawsuit was filed Feb. 26 in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, home of the ABR’s Chicago testing center.
According to the lawsuit, the ABR had illegally tied its initial certifications to its Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program, using “various anti-competitive, exclusionary, and unlawful actions” to promote the program.
Full Content: Bloomberg
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand