A bipartisan group of state attorneys general is calling for a special dividend being paid to Albertson holders in connection with the supermarket chain’s planned sale to Kroger be stopped, as part of the ongoing challenge to a merger that some fear would create local monopolies in several US regions.
“We are deeply concerned about the deal,” Washington DC Attorney General Karl Racine told CNBC in an interview. “We are specifically concerned about this deal because with the announced merger was a significant nearly $4 billion special dividend announcement, which could be valid or could amount to a massive improper giveaway to certain shareholders.”
Read also: US Senate Panel To Hold Antitrust Hearing On Kroger’s Albertsons Buy
Racine said he’s asking “nicely” in a letter to stop the payment of the special dividend, though all options are on the table. He said the option of a potential legal block to payment of the special dividend is still considered a possibility.
Albertsons agreed to pay a special dividend of up to $4B, or $6.85/share, to its shareholders in accordance with the terms to be paid on Nov. 7 in connection with its planned $25 billion sale to Kroger (KR).
The plea from the state attorney generals comes after Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) last week called for the Federal Trade Commission to block the transaction.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand