The 10th Circuit on Monday overturned a $43 million judgment, finding that Boeing subsidiary Jeppesen Sanderson does not owe Massachusetts-based software company SolidFX the money for lost profits. Jeppesen Sanderson, which creates terminal charts for Boeing pilots, asked SolidFX in 2008 to develop an electronic app that would act as an e-reader for Jeppesen data for pilots.
After negotiating a licensing agreement, SolidFX began selling the iRex devices that came embedded with Jeppesen’s data on a platform created by SolidFX. After Apple released its iPad in 2010, SolidFX asked Jeppesen for the toolkit used in the app, to adapt it for the iPad. Jeppesen refused.
Months later, Jeppesen announced that it had created its own iPad app, free for its terminal chart users.
SolidFX sued Jeppesen in Colorado Federal Court on breach of contract and antitrust charges, claiming that Jeppesen had concealed its own development of the iPad app.
US District Judge William J. Martinez presided over an eight-day trial in April 2014, in which a jury awarded SolidFX $43 million in lost profits due to Jeppesen’s breach of contract. But the trial court rejected SolidFX’s antitrust claims, finding that Jeppesen had simply exercised its right to refuse to license copyrighted work.
Jeppesen appealed the $43 million award, claiming SolidFX could not recover lost profits from its contract claims because the licensing agreement expressly prohibited it. SolidFX cross-appealed on its antitrust claim, saying Jeppesen illegally monopolized the product SolidFX and Jeppesen created together.
Full Content: Courthouse News
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand