In a proposed class action lawsuit filed in a Kansas federal court, a consortium of asset and wealth management firms, including Mariner Wealth and American Century Investments, has been accused of violating antitrust laws by engaging in a conspiracy to restrict employee recruitment and hiring practices. The lawsuit, initiated by two former employees of TortoiseEcofin Investments, one of the defendants, alleges that the companies collaborated in implementing “no-poach” agreements, effectively stifling competition and depressing wages within the industry.
The plaintiffs contend that by entering into these agreements, the companies aimed to maintain a stranglehold on the labor market, preventing employees from freely seeking opportunities at competing firms. Additionally named in the lawsuit are Montage Investments and 1248 Holdings LLC, formerly known as Bicknell Family Holding Company.
Describing the case as a matter concerning the fundamental rights of employees to access free and fair job markets, the lawsuit underscores the broader implications of such antitrust practices within the investment sector.
Responding to the allegations, American Century Investments issued a statement affirming its commitment to fair competition and regulatory compliance. The company asserted its intention to address the claims through the legal process.
At the time of reporting, legal representatives for the plaintiffs had not provided a comment on the matter.
The lawsuit reflects a broader trend of civil litigation across various industries, including aerospace engineering, shipbuilding, and high fashion, where similar allegations of collusion to suppress employee mobility and maintain artificially low wages have surfaced in recent years. As the case unfolds, it is poised to shed light on the complexities surrounding competition and labor practices within the asset and wealth management sector.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand