What Does The New EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) Mean For Companies Doing Business In The EU?
By:
(Covington Competition)In December of 2022, the EU introduced the Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR), ushering in a novel mechanism designed to safeguard the integrity of the European Union’s (EU) internal market against the potential distortions caused by foreign subsidies. The FSR was enacted to address what was perceived as a regulatory void, as the existing EU State aid rules primarily governed subsidies provided by EU member states, leaving subsidies from foreign nations unregulated. Its implementation officially commenced on the 12th of July 2023, with mandatory notification requirements coming into effect on the 12th of October 2023.
Crucial points to bear in mind regarding the FSR and its accompanying Implementing Regulation (IR) include:
- The FSR creates an additional layer of deal conditionality for sizeable transactions besides potential foreign direct investment (FDI) and merger control clearance.
- From 12 October 2023, when acquiring (including jointly) control of a company in the EU or participating in a public tender in the EU, companies – including EU ones – will have to notify the European Commission (Commission) of foreign financial contributions (FFCs) received from non-EU states if the relevant thresholds are met or if the Commission so requests. Notification is compulsory and suspensory. Failure to notify or to suspend closing pending clearance may lead to severe sanctions. Information requirements are far-reaching as they comprise FFCs irrespective of whether they have a link with the notified transaction or public procurement procedure.
- Beyond notified transactions and public procurement procedures, the Commission may launch ex officio investigations where it suspects that a foreign subsidy may distort the internal market. The FSR can relate to any type of activity unless already governed by other legislation.
- Where following an investigation (initiated either in relation to a notification or on an ex officio basis) the Commission determines that a foreign subsidy risks distorting the EU internal market, remedies could apply, and the Commission could even prohibit the transaction or the award of a public contract…
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand