By: Nicol Turner Lee & Obioha Chijioke (Brookings Tech Tank)
In the face of a void in congressional legislation addressing artificial intelligence (AI), individual states are taking the initiative to formulate their own proposals aimed at mitigating the potential adverse effects of AI. Faced with the uncertainty surrounding federal policymaking, states are forging ahead with measures addressing privacy, bias, discrimination, safety, and security.
Although the recent Executive Order on AI from the White House marks a positive stride, its comprehensive execution necessitates national legislation that incorporates the October 2022 Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights, the January 2023 NIST AI Management Framework, and insights gleaned from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s AI Insights Forum.
Despite the evident enthusiasm of federal lawmakers and corporate leaders to propel the United States forward in AI capabilities and global leadership, the absence of new legislation is prompting states to independently undertake AI oversight and regulation measures. Authors Nicol Turner Lee and Obioha Chijioke delve into this complex landscape, shedding light on the evolving role of states in shaping AI policy…
Featured News
Australia Passes Strict Social Media Ban for Under-16s
Nov 28, 2024 by
CPI
Google Appeals Ruling Overhaul of Play Store in Epic Games Lawsuit
Nov 28, 2024 by
CPI
FTC Investigates Uber for Alleged Subscription Violations
Nov 28, 2024 by
CPI
India’s Watchdog Launches Investigation Into Google’s Real-Money Gaming Policies
Nov 28, 2024 by
CPI
Microsoft Under FTC Scrutiny for Cloud, AI, and Licensing Practices
Nov 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI