‘Abusive’ Acts and Practices: Dodd-Frank’s Behaviorally Informed Authority Over Consumer Credit Markets and its Application to Teaser Rates
Posted by Social Science Research Network
‘Abusive’ Acts and Practices: Dodd-Frank’s Behaviorally Informed Authority Over Consumer Credit Markets and its Application to Teaser Rates Patrick Corrigan (New York University)
Abstract: The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, enacted in 2010, authorizes the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to prohibit abusive acts and practices that, among other things, materially interfere “with the ability of a consumer to understand a term or condition” as well as acts and practices that take “unreasonable advantage of a lack of understanding on the part of the consumer of the material risks, costs, or conditions of the product or service.” The project of this Note is to understand Congress’s grant of abuse authority to the CFPB. The thesis is that the statutory language of the abuse authority, and particularly its focus on consumer “understanding,” rejects traditional neoclassical economic logic. Instead, the abuse authority directs the CFPB to regulate problems articulated by the burgeoning literature of behavioral law and economics, particularly problems of imperfect rationality. Drawing on lessons from antitrust law, this paper proposes a legal standard for operationalizing the abuse standard. Putting this standard into practice, the paper asks whether the CFPB might be justified in regulating a common pricing structure in credit card markets — credit card teaser rates — under its abuse authority.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand