Airline cooperation and international travel: analyses of the impact of antitrust immunity and joint ventures on fares and traffic
Posted by Social Science Research Network
Airline cooperation and international travel: analyses of the impact of antitrust immunity and joint ventures on fares and traffic
Yair Eilat (Government of the State of Israel), Mark A. Israel & Robert J Calzaretta Jr. (Compass Lexecon)
Abstract: This paper analyzes the impact of varying degrees of airline cooperation on nonstop and connecting international traffic, using a detailed dataset of international travel between the United States and other countries for the years 1998 to 2015. We demonstrate that cooperation by airlines — most notably, the formation of “metal neutral” joint ventures, along with grants of antitrust immunity (ATI) more generally — generates substantial consumer benefits. Specifically, for connecting passengers, we find that ATIs generate fare reductions (relative to interline or simple codeshare itineraries), although these reductions are not significantly larger than those generated by airline alliances without immunity, while JVs lead to substantially larger fare reductions of around eight percent, nearly identical to the reductions associated with “online” travel with a single airline. For nonstop passengers, we find that ATI and JV cooperation between airlines does not, in general, generate higher nonstop fares on “overlap” routes where competing airlines are part of an ATI or JV. Finally, we find that ATIs and JVs are associated with increased segment traffic and net entry on existing and new routes. This expansion of output rounds out our results, demonstrating that, on the whole, ATI grants — particularly when coupled with the formation of JVs — have been strongly pro-competitive, generating lower fares on connecting routes and increased traffic on segments served by multiple alliance partners, with no associated increase in nonstop fares where partner airlines overlap.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand