In the wake of a sweeping antitrust case brought forth by the US Justice Department and 15 states against tech giant Apple, the company finds itself embroiled in a flurry of new legal battles.
At least three proposed class-action lawsuits have been filed in California and New Jersey federal courts, accusing Apple of monopolizing the smartphone market and inflating product costs through anticompetitive practices.
The lawsuits, filed by iPhone owners seeking to represent millions of consumers, echo the allegations made by the Justice Department. They claim that Apple violated U.S. antitrust laws by stifling technology advancements for messaging apps, digital wallets, and other features that could have fostered competition in the smartphone market.
Apple, headquartered in Cupertino, California, has denied the government’s accusations but has yet to comment on the newly filed consumer lawsuits.
Related: The DOJ’s New Monopoly Suit Against Apple Targets Lock-In Tactics
Steve Berman, an attorney from Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, whose firm filed one of the new cases, expressed satisfaction with the Justice Department’s alignment with their approach. Berman’s firm had previously sued Apple over allegations of hindering competition for its Apple Pay mobile wallet.
Meanwhile, attorneys representing the other newly filed cases have not provided immediate comments to Reuters.
Apple is no stranger to legal battles surrounding its business practices. In February, a judge ruled that the company must face a class-action lawsuit alleging that it monopolized the market for iPhone apps. Despite these challenges, Apple continues to contest the claims.
The outcome of these lawsuits could have significant implications for Apple and the broader smartphone industry, potentially reshaping competition dynamics and consumer access to technology.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand