William Kolasky, Apr 30, 2009
A senior official in the Bush Antitrust Division has defended [recent] judicial decisions as signaling not less antitrust, but better antitrust. How the Chicago School Overshot the Mark seeks to debate this proposition. The contributors to the book, which include some of the nations most distinguished antitrust scholars, argue forcefully that while many of the Supreme Courts decisions over the last 30 years were a necessary midcourse correction from the overly interventionist antitrust jurisprudence of the Supreme Court during Earl Warren´s tenure as Chief Justice, the federal antitrust agencies and the courts have now overshot the mark in adopting too laissez-faire an approach to antitrust enforcement. More importantly, they seek to offer specific proposals for reinvigorating antitrust enforcement, something Barack Obama has promised that his administration will do. With his new administration having just taken office in January, this book could not be more timely.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
Spanish Minister Defends Record as Flood Crisis Casts Shadow on EU Role
Nov 22, 2024 by
CPI
UK Antitrust Regulator Signals Flexibility in Merger Reviews to Boost Economic Growth
Nov 21, 2024 by
CPI
US Supreme Court Declines to Hear Appeal in Google Antitrust Records Dispute
Nov 21, 2024 by
CPI
Matt Gaetz Withdraws from Consideration for US Attorney General Amid Controversy
Nov 21, 2024 by
CPI
Morocco Fines US Pharma Firm Viatris Over Merger Notification Breach
Nov 21, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI