A coalition of cannabis companies has taken legal action by enlisting the services of the law firm Boies Schiller Flexnor to file a lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland. The suit, which was initiated in U.S. federal court in Massachusetts, aims to challenge the federal prohibition of cannabis, citing the detrimental impact it has on state-legal cannabis commerce.
The group behind the legal challenge comprises several notable entities, including Verano, Canna Provisions, Wiseacre Farm, and Gyasi Sellers, who serves as the chief executive of Treevit. These companies and individuals are acting as plaintiffs in the federal lawsuit.
Notably, Ascend Wellness, TerrAscend, Green Thumb Industries, Eminence Capital, and Poseidon Investment Management are among the foundational supporters of this legal endeavor.
The central argument put forth by the plaintiffs is that the federal criminalization of cannabis, despite being legal in 38 states, is both unconstitutional and unjust, particularly for small businesses in the industry. They contend that cannabis enterprises are unfairly obstructed from securing loans and investments, which hampers their ability to establish conventional banking relationships. Additionally, they face discriminatory tax policies.
Read more: Merger Creates Biggest Cannabis Company In The World
Boies Schiller Flexnor, the law firm spearheading this legal challenge, has a track record of winning high-profile cases, including an antitrust case against Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) on behalf of the U.S. government and the successful effort to overturn California’s same-sex marriage ban.
While the outcome of the lawsuit remains uncertain, Jefferies analyst Owen Bennett pointed out that the legal landscape surrounding cannabis has significantly evolved since a similar case failed in 2005. At that time, far fewer states permitted medical cannabis, and none allowed adult recreational use. Bennett noted that the circumstances have changed, with even Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, in 2021, expressing concerns that national cannabis prohibition might be unconstitutional.
The lawsuit contends that numerous cannabis businesses are suffering as a result of federal prohibition, leading to job losses and the destruction of individual wealth. The legal battle is expected to unfold as the cannabis industry continues to grapple with the complexities of state and federal regulations.
Source: Morning Star
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand