Chile: Medical professionals denounce ‘monopoly’ following tariff readjustment
Chile’s Medical College and medical professionals’ unions have said they will present a complaint before the country’s Competition Defense Tribunal (TDLC) over what they consider a “monopolistic and domineering behavior” from the National Health Fund. The unrest follows an annual readjustment of FONASA’s rates, which for two consecutive years have increased at a lower pace than the country’s market index.
“We consider FONASA to have engaged in monopolistic and dominant behaviors in setting their new tariffs” said Luis Velozo, General Secretary of the Medical college. The union requested the intervention of competition authorities two years ago, although that case was dismissed.
Commentingon the matter, Rafael Caviedes, president of Chile’s Association of Private Health Insurance Providers (ISAPRES) explained that the tariffs “are readjusted according to economic performance and the agreements that ISAPRES reach with clinics and medical providers, which is done individually, each ISAPRES negotiating with specific groups.
Full content: Entorno Inteligente
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand