Keith Hylton, Sep 01, 2005
Perhaps no area of antitrust law provokes as much controversy as predatory pricing, the theory that a firm violates the antitrust laws by setting its price too low. Under the standard definition, predatory pricing involves a strategy of cutting price below the level at which a competitor can survive in the market and then raising price to the monopoly level in a later stage known as recoupment period.
Featured News
Google Revamps Android App Store Rules, Cuts Fees Amid Global Antitrust Pressure
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
White House Reviews Tencent’s Gaming Stakes as Trump Prepares for China Visit
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
Charles River Associates Adds Senior Consultant to Antitrust Practice
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates Major Fertilizer Producers Over Possible Price Coordination
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
NY Bill Would Bar AI Chatbots From Providing ‘Substantive’ Medical or Legal Responses
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece