Comment of the Global Antitrust Institute, George Mason University School of Law, on the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission’s Digital Platforms Inquiry, Preliminary Report
Posted by Social Science Research Network
Comment of the Global Antitrust Institute, George Mason University School of Law, on the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission’s Digital Platforms Inquiry, Preliminary Report
By John M. Yun, Douglas H. Ginsburg, Joshua D. Wright & Tad Lipsky (George Mason University)
This Comment is submitted to the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) for consideration in relation to its Digital Platforms Inquiry, Preliminary Report (2018). We detail several fundamental methodological shortcomings and analytical gaps in the Preliminary Report, which ultimately do not support the recommendations considered for implementation. The GAI Competition Advocacy Program provides a wide range of recommendations to facilitate adoption of economically sound competition policy.
Featured News
UK Clears Google’s AI Investment in Anthropic, No Antitrust Probe
Nov 19, 2024 by
CPI
India’s Watchdog Bans WhatsApp Data Sharing for Five Years, Fines Meta $25.4M
Nov 18, 2024 by
CPI
Major US Potato Processors Face Price-Fixing Allegations in New Suits
Nov 18, 2024 by
CPI
French Watchdog Demands Separation of Kindred Brands by FDJ Following Acquisition
Nov 18, 2024 by
CPI
Italian Court Overturns €5 Million Fine on Eni’s Plenitude Over Price Hike Dispute
Nov 18, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI