Comparing the US & the EU Failing Firm Defense: Reflections from an Economic Perspective
Posted by Social Science Research Network
Comparing the US & the EU Failing Firm Defense: Reflections from an Economic Perspective
Marianela López-Galdos (George Washington University)
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to compare the failing firm defense under the European Union and the United States antitrust regimes. In order to do so, the relevant case law and regulations will be studied. Moreover, to better understand the difficulties that the enforcement of the failing company defense brings about, the main problems of the application of this doctrine will be explained. Finally, other considerations such as efficiencies and social and environmental concerns related to the failing firm defense will be explored.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand