Nov 05, 2007
The first two decisions by the Competition Commission of Singapore, issued in the first quarter of 2007, represent important milestones in the implementation of competition law in Singapore since the enactment of the Competition Act 2004. Both cases involved cooperation agreements between airline operators who had sought negative clearance through the Commission´s notification process. This article provides an overview of the legal and policy background behind the new competition regime and, in particular, explains how the new statutory provisions concerned with anticompetitive agreements were applied to the two notified agreements described above. An analysis of these two cases is also conducted to illustrate how the competition regulator has interpreted the relevant competition law principles in the course of its decision-making process.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
Exxon Mobil to Lay Off Nearly 400 Employees in Texas Following Merger
Nov 17, 2024 by
CPI
US Department of Justice Updates Guidance on Corporate Compliance Programs
Nov 17, 2024 by
CPI
Pennsylvania’s Antitrust Efforts to Save Charleroi Pyrex Plant Hit Legal Roadblock
Nov 17, 2024 by
CPI
Airbus CEO: SpaceX Model Would Violate EU Antitrust Rules
Nov 17, 2024 by
CPI
NASCAR Clears Path for 23XI, Front Row to Race Amid Antitrust Fight
Nov 17, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI