Decision-Making Powers and Institutional Design in Competition Cases: The Brazilian Experience
Ana Paula Martinez, Mariana Tavares de Araujo, Sep 11, 2014
This article discusses the experience of Brazil regarding institutional design and decision-making powers and Brazil’s efforts to enhance its convergence to international best practices, thereby improving Brazil’s competition law enforcement. We describe the history of Brazil’s competition law and policy system, and go on to discuss the benefits, as well as the efficiency and productivity costs, that result from the bifurcation of prosecutorial and adjudicative roles within the administrative system; warn that independency for a competition agency can be a two-edged sword; and emphasize the need to consider resources when designing and implementing merger and control systems.
Featured News
Exxon Mobil to Lay Off Nearly 400 Employees in Texas Following Merger
Nov 17, 2024 by
CPI
US Department of Justice Updates Guidance on Corporate Compliance Programs
Nov 17, 2024 by
CPI
Pennsylvania’s Antitrust Efforts to Save Charleroi Pyrex Plant Hit Legal Roadblock
Nov 17, 2024 by
CPI
Airbus CEO: SpaceX Model Would Violate EU Antitrust Rules
Nov 17, 2024 by
CPI
NASCAR Clears Path for 23XI, Front Row to Race Amid Antitrust Fight
Nov 17, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI