The US Justice Department is set to increase its team of data experts responsible for examining how companies use consumer data to violate antitrust laws. The department’s antitrust chief, Jonathan Kanter, has revealed plans to advertise further job listings for data scientists and analysts as part of the expansion effort. The move represents a significant push by the DOJ to scrutinize digital monopolies and could lead to more aggressive action against companies that exploit customer data to gain an unfair competitive advantage.
The DOJ’s decision to hire more data experts comes amid growing concerns about the power of big tech companies and their use of consumer data. The agency has been investigating several high-profile cases involving digital monopolies, including Google and Facebook. Kanter noted that these investigations require a deep understanding of how these companies collect, analyze and monetize user data.
“One of the things we’re confronting in any market we address today,” Kanter told CNN, “whether it’s health care, energy, consumer tech, enterprise tech and everything in between, the importance of data is so significant, so substantial that we need to understand at an expert level how that data is used, how it affects the economics, how it affects the potential for tipping, moat-building, and other competitive dynamics.”
In the realm of antitrust enforcement, Kanter has proposed a potential future focus on “dark patterns.” These refer to design choices made by a company in its website or product, which are intended to steer consumers towards the company’s preferred choice – for example, agreeing to surrender their personal information.
“It’s really important that we understand the good, the bad, and sometimes the ugly of how dark patterns or personalized targeting can influence how consumers respond when they respond, and the extent to which they are able to benefit from competition,” Kanter said.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand