The Dutch data protection authority (DPA) has imposed a hefty fine of 10 million euros ($11 million) on Uber for violating privacy regulations related to its handling of drivers’ personal data. The DPA’s investigation revealed several lapses in Uber’s data protection practices, leading to concerns about the duration of data retention, inadequate security measures for cross-border data transfers, and obstructive practices hindering drivers from exercising their privacy rights.
One of the key findings by the DPA was Uber’s failure to specify in its terms and conditions the duration for which it retained drivers’ personal data. Additionally, the ride-sharing giant was faulted for not detailing the security measures in place when transmitting such data to entities outside the European Economic Area (EEA), without disclosing the specific countries involved.
The authority also highlighted Uber’s alleged obstruction of drivers attempting to exercise their right to privacy by creating unnecessary complexities in the personal data access request process. Despite these concerns, the DPA acknowledged that Uber had taken corrective measures to address some of the identified issues, reported Reuters.
Read more: EU Probes Dutch Ex-Commissioner Over Uber Lobbying Claims
In response to the fine, an Uber spokesperson stated in an emailed statement to Reuters, “The Dutch data protection authority has acknowledged that Uber fixed the small number of ‘low impact’ issues raised by the drivers, while dismissing the vast majority of their claims as unfounded.” The spokesperson emphasized that the company is committed to continuous improvement in its data request processes.
The origins of the investigation trace back to more than 170 French drivers who lodged complaints with a French human rights organization. The organization subsequently filed a complaint with the French data protection authority. However, due to Uber having its European headquarters in the Netherlands, the case was transferred to the Dutch DPA.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
CPI Talks on Mobile OS Interoperability
Dec 22, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand