France, Germany, and Italy have solidified their stance on the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI), aiming to shape a united front in negotiations at the European level. A joint paper, obtained by Reuters, reveals the trio’s consensus on key principles that are expected to accelerate discussions within the European Commission, the European Parliament, and the EU Council.
The central theme of the agreement revolves around advocating for “mandatory self-regulation through codes of conduct” specifically for foundation models of AI, which are designed to generate a diverse range of outputs. The governments, however, are vocal in their opposition to what they term as “un-tested norms,” emphasizing the need for a balanced and practical approach.
The joint paper underlines a crucial distinction, stating, “Together we underline that the AI Act regulates the application of AI and not the technology as such. The inherent risks lie in the application of AI systems rather than in the technology itself.” This perspective aligns with the broader sentiment that responsible AI use is the key focus, rather than stifling technological innovation.
Read more: Generative AI Tools At Center Of New Regulation
According to the proposed regulations, developers of foundation models would be required to create “model cards” that furnish essential information about a machine learning model. These model cards are intended to include comprehensive details about the model’s functionality, capabilities, and limitations. The guidelines for developing model cards are rooted in best practices within the developer community, ensuring a standardized and transparent approach.
The joint paper also suggests the establishment of an AI governance body, tasked with developing guidelines and overseeing the application of model cards. This body could play a pivotal role in ensuring adherence to ethical standards and best practices in the rapidly evolving field of AI.
As negotiations continue within the European Union, the shared position of France, Germany, and Italy is poised to influence the direction of AI regulation, emphasizing a pragmatic and application-focused approach rather than restrictive measures targeting the technology itself. The trio’s collaborative effort marks a significant step towards a harmonized European stance on AI governance.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand