![](https://www.pymnts.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/data-dive-amazon-bank-of-america-apple-watch.jpg)
Apple has been hit with a complaint from the French antitrust watchdog over allegations it has imposed unfair conditions for the use of user data in advertising.
According to the French Autorite De La Concurrence, Apple’s practices in the sector of app distribution are discriminating, non-objective and non-transparent. This decision is the result of a 2020 complaint by four French advertising associations.
Apple, in defense of itself, stated: “The mechanism gives users more control by requiring all apps to ask permission before tracking them.” This statement follows rule violations with European Union privacy regulations that the four associations alleged to have taken place.
The Autorite De La Concurrence made it clear that they would be available for any mediation between Apple and the associations to make sure the current regulations reflect the wishes of the users and the companies involved.
Read more: Apple Battles Subpoenas In US Court Against Qualcomm
In response to the message of objection, Apple said it was “surprised” and “disappointed” by the regulator’s position and was “committed to working with the Autorite De La Concurrence”. They also stated that “consumer privacy and data security are fundamental to our products and services” and are working on incorporating transparency and clarity on their procedures.
Apple’s recent practices have sparked a debate within the tech world about the company’s commitment to user privacy and data protection. The statement of objection is seen as a step to protect consumers from unfair practices within the industry.
Apple has the opportunity to work with the Autorite De La Concurrence to ensure the correct use of user data. In the meantime, users will have to monitor their data closely and are encouraged to take control of their privacy and use their data responsibly.
Source: Investing
Featured News
EU Industry Chief Warns Elon Musk to Comply with EU Law Ahead of Trump Interview on X
Aug 12, 2024 by
CPI
US Judge Dismisses Antitrust Suit Against Google, but Consumers May Get Another Chance
Aug 12, 2024 by
CPI
Objections Raised Against Landmark $2.7 Billion NCAA Settlement
Aug 12, 2024 by
CPI
Orrick Strengthens Antitrust and Competition Practice with New Partner Hire in London
Aug 12, 2024 by
CPI
Austrian Group NOYB Files GDPR Complaint Against X Over AI Data Use
Aug 12, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Editorial Board Antipasto
Aug 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Enforcement in Labor Markets – A Little Less Conversation and a Little More Action
Aug 8, 2024 by
CPI
The Talent Trap: Acqui-Hires and Non-Competes from an Antitrust Perspective
Aug 8, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange – Pitfalls from Recent Case Law and Enforcement Practice, and How to Avoid Them
Aug 8, 2024 by
CPI
The American Express Decision and its Critics
Aug 8, 2024 by
CPI