Google, a tech giant, has accused India’s Competition Commission of India (CCI) of protecting Amazon after it ordered the tech giant to make changes to its business model. The company approached India’s Supreme Court to quash the October 2022 order from CCI. While CCI fined Google INR 13.38B ($163M) for anti-competitive practices, the tech giant has argued that the antitrust body’s directives were ‘only to protect’ Amazon.
In its October 2022 ruling, the CCI said its investigators found Google’s contractual restrictions had ‘reduced the ability and incentive of device manufacturers to develop and sell’ devices operating on Android forks, hurting consumer interests. Amazon said to the CCI during the probe that Google’s restrictions impeded the development of its Android fork called Fire OS.
Read more: UK Watchdog Eyes Google, Amazon, Microsoft In Antitrust Probe
Google has expressed its concern about India’s Android decision as the directives were seen even more sweeping than those imposed in the European Commission’s landmark 2018 ruling against the company’s Android market abuse. Google and Amazon have been in an ongoing battle for many years, particularly in India, where the growth of the e-commerce sector has been astronomical.
In its defense, Google, in a June 26 filing to the Supreme Court, stated, “Globally, FireOS failed commercially due to poor user experience. In India, the Fire Phone was not even launched. Thus, the Commission called Amazon’s lack of attempt to compete in India a failure and attributed it to Google’s agreements.”
According to court documents, Amazon told Indian investigators the creation of Fire OS, as a forked Android, took ‘substantial resources’, including thousands of employee hours. However, the antitrust body ruled against Google’s argument. Google is now arguing in India’s Supreme Court against any penalty and claiming that it did not abuse its market position.
The CCI wants Google to comply with its all its directives, the antitrust body said in a separate filing. This case will be closely watched and will have implications for the tech industry as a whole. Google is hopeful that the court will rule in their favour to protect their business model.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand