Google, a tech giant, has accused India’s Competition Commission of India (CCI) of protecting Amazon after it ordered the tech giant to make changes to its business model. The company approached India’s Supreme Court to quash the October 2022 order from CCI. While CCI fined Google INR 13.38B ($163M) for anti-competitive practices, the tech giant has argued that the antitrust body’s directives were ‘only to protect’ Amazon.
In its October 2022 ruling, the CCI said its investigators found Google’s contractual restrictions had ‘reduced the ability and incentive of device manufacturers to develop and sell’ devices operating on Android forks, hurting consumer interests. Amazon said to the CCI during the probe that Google’s restrictions impeded the development of its Android fork called Fire OS.
Read more: UK Watchdog Eyes Google, Amazon, Microsoft In Antitrust Probe
Google has expressed its concern about India’s Android decision as the directives were seen even more sweeping than those imposed in the European Commission’s landmark 2018 ruling against the company’s Android market abuse. Google and Amazon have been in an ongoing battle for many years, particularly in India, where the growth of the e-commerce sector has been astronomical.
In its defense, Google, in a June 26 filing to the Supreme Court, stated, “Globally, FireOS failed commercially due to poor user experience. In India, the Fire Phone was not even launched. Thus, the Commission called Amazon’s lack of attempt to compete in India a failure and attributed it to Google’s agreements.”
According to court documents, Amazon told Indian investigators the creation of Fire OS, as a forked Android, took ‘substantial resources’, including thousands of employee hours. However, the antitrust body ruled against Google’s argument. Google is now arguing in India’s Supreme Court against any penalty and claiming that it did not abuse its market position.
The CCI wants Google to comply with its all its directives, the antitrust body said in a separate filing. This case will be closely watched and will have implications for the tech industry as a whole. Google is hopeful that the court will rule in their favour to protect their business model.
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI