Google is facing yet another legal battle, this time from Epic Games, the creator of the popular game Fortnite. In a new parallel legal battle, Google finds itself under the scrutiny of federal courts once again, this time facing an antitrust lawsuit brought by Epic Games, the creators of the popular video game Fortnite.
The trial, set to kick off Monday in San Francisco, is expected to last a month, and Epic Games is making a case against Google, alleging violations of state and federal antitrust laws, as well as a breach of Google’s own founding principle, “Don’t be evil” reported the New York Times.
Epic Games argues that Google is leveraging its dominant position in the online search and advertising industry to unfairly stifle competition and innovation among app developers on its Google Play Store for Android mobile phones. The video game developer filed its complaint in 2020, accusing Google of sidelining its famous motto and using its sheer size to harm competitors, innovators, customers, and users across multiple markets it has monopolized.
According to the New York Times, the legal dispute initially stemmed from Epic Games’ attempt to bypass Google Play Store fees by allowing Fortnite players to make direct in-app purchases through Epic.
In response, Google removed Fortnite from its store. If Epic Games prevails in this case, it could compel Google to revise its stringent Play Store policies, potentially allowing other companies to establish competing app stores and affording developers greater flexibility in avoiding the fees Google collects from in-app purchases. Google’s standard fees include a 15 percent charge for customer payments on app subscriptions and a 30 percent fee for in-app purchases made in apps downloaded from the Google Play Store.
These simultaneous antitrust lawsuits underscore Google’s ongoing battle on multiple legal fronts as it faces increased scrutiny from regulators and competitors seeking to diminish its influence over the internet.
Featured News
Prestigious Universities Accused of Price-Fixing in Financial Aid Scheme
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
Honda and Nissan Reportedly Exploring Merger
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
EU Regulator Fines Meta €251 Million Over 2018 Facebook Data Breach
Dec 17, 2024 by
CPI
US Antitrust Chief Jonathan Kanter to Step Down After Pivotal Three-Year Tenure
Dec 17, 2024 by
CPI
Sandoz Settles Price-Fixing Allegations with $275 Million Agreement
Dec 17, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Remedies After Illumina/GRAIL– The Thorny Question of Proportionality
Dec 17, 2024 by
CPI
Why Was Illumina/GRAIL Blocked in the EU? Reviewing The European Commission’s Assessment of Vertical Mergers in Light of the 2022 Prohibition Decision
Dec 17, 2024 by
Will Sparks
The Role of Uncertainty in the Future European Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Lessons Learned From Illumina/GRAIL
Dec 17, 2024 by
Svend Albaek & Daniel Donath
Illumina’s Light on Article 22 EUMR: The Suspended Step and Uncertain Future of EU Merger Control Over Below-Threshold “Killer” Mergers
Dec 17, 2024 by
Anna Tzanaki
EU-Level Jurisdiction Over “Killer Acquisitions” in the Aftermath of Illumina/GRAIL
Dec 17, 2024 by
Peter Whelan